Customer Rating: 




Summary: I hate zooms, but...
Comment: I am a snob of sorts. I use prime Nikkors, mostly manual focus, and mostly fast apertures. In thirty years of Nikon use, I use manual focus Nikkors even on my auto-focus film cameras.
I tested the waters of digital with a D40 and D60 (the D40 was stolen), and the kit lens that came with each was everything that made me stay with my metal and glass Nikkors when auto-focus ruled the film world, too light, too flimsy, and lacking of a feel of precision. I used my manual focus Nikkors on the D60 with good effect, giving up metering, and a less than exact focusing ability, especially at f/one-point-something.
After reading a review for the 16-85mm Nikkor zoom, I decided to get one so that I could at least have one auto-everything lens for when I wanted to be lazy, or hand the camera to someone else to use. When the lens arrived, it looked much better than the kit lens that sat unused after a brief test period. The lens was first rate in terms of fit and finish. The impression of a fine lens continued when I mounted it and shot images in my low-lit living room. A sharp shot taken at 1/3rd of a second at the 85mm setting was enough to let me know that the new VR label was a true tool, and not just a selling point.
I now have several hundred photos made with this lens, and not a bad one from the lens' fault. The prints I had made from my lab had the tech asking me what I was shooting with... the files were so good.
FWIW... my normal working wide-angle in the film days was 24mm, and this lens has that angle of view when set at 16mm. I was at home with this lens on the first outing, and I stopped thinking about film-versus-digital...I was shooting with a 24mm lens. I never liked the 28mm focal length, so this lens was the one I was waiting for, and I'm glad it came along. There is a difference between a 24mm and 28mm (on film), and it shows up here in the digital world too.
I can recommend this as a quality optic for the digital shooter.